Google Instant Makes SEO Irrelevant
Image by Robert Scoble.
Here’s what this means: no two people will see the same web. Once a single search would do the trick - and everyone saw the same results. That’s what made search engine optimization work. Now, with this, everyone is going to start tweaking their searches in real-time. The reason this is a game changer is feedback. When you get feedback, you change your behaviors. Think about it. When you push a door and it doesn’t open quickly, you push harder. When you try to drive a car up a hill and it doesn’t go as fast as you would like, you step on the gas. Feedback changes your behavior. Google Instant means no one will see the same web anymore, making optimizing it virtually impossible. Real-time feedback changes people’s behaviors.
Sorry, but I don’t agree at all. This isn’t personalization. Instead it’s: 1) Increasing the number of queries people do, 2) increasing the number of terms per query, 3) reducing the amount of time people spend looking at queries with poor results.
I think it’s a fantastic improvement and will help people sniff out the “right” search terms faster. But to say it’s personalization is stupid link baiting. Google does do personalization (taking into account your past searches, social graph, etc), and this isn’t it.
(Source: soupsoup)
-
linkbuilding-bureau liked this
-
bhsturk reblogged this from soupsoup
-
seopakistanlahore reblogged this from soupsoup
-
best-san-diego-seo liked this
-
rankandfile liked this
-
omnicurious liked this
-
jojo5892 liked this
-
kingsley2 reblogged this from rohanpinto
-
karina-esque reblogged this from writeratheart
-
derrickbradley liked this
-
derrickbradley reblogged this from caterpillarcowboy and added:
Image by Robert Scoble.
-
howardtharp liked this
-
6h057 said:
SHUT. DOWN. EVERYTHING.
-
erikcharleshanson reblogged this from soupsoup
-
invincibeard liked this
-
sparksdo reblogged this from soupsoup
-
davesparks reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
“Game changer” doesn’t mean as much when the game *is* change. -1 for overuse. ;-) terribly fascinating otherwise....
-
davesparks liked this
-
gautamelon reblogged this from caterpillarcowboy
-
strongerbonds2 reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
This is great news, as we were getting tired of writing for the sake of pickup by search. Our philosophy had always been...
-
nadja liked this
-
jonathanmarcus liked this
-
joesunga liked this
-
ferrydust liked this
-
writeratheart liked this
-
writeratheart reblogged this from soupsoup
-
bhell13 liked this
-
tumblklaat liked this
-
roo-la-la liked this
-
crowtendr liked this
-
lucaswarren liked this
-
austra reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
a) oh great, google. i’m learning SEO right now for work, don’t make me shoot myself in the face. b) i don’t like this...
-
liberalsarecool liked this
-
yeahmon reblogged this from peterwknox
-
un liked this
-
azspot liked this
-
erinjoan said:
“Instead it’s: 1) Increasing the number of queries people do, 2) increasing the number of terms per query” = more $$ for Google in ads
-
blitherocher liked this
-
quickandcurious liked this
-
section9 liked this
-
ralphsaunders liked this
-
losingweightinthecity liked this
-
caterpillarcowboy reblogged this from peterwknox and added:
Sorry, but I don’t agree at all. This isn’t personalization. Instead it’s: 1) Increasing the number of queries people...
-
alternrg said:
Even more fun to play:)
-
rubitues liked this
-
simplisticecstasy reblogged this from soupsoup
-
simplisticecstasy liked this
-
richtong reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
Completely disagree. Steve seems to forget here that SEO stands for “search engine optimization“…meaning you optimize...
-
bbbrad reblogged this from soupsoup
- Show more notes
